Legal Drift

LAW NOT ONLY FOR LAWYERS BUT FOR THE LAYMAN

Economy Politics World 

A Raging Cold War between China and United States – Two of World’s Biggest Diplomats

meghna 2 Comments , , , , , , , , , , ,

China US Cold War - World's DiplomatsThe prospective meeting of two Nobel peace prize laureate has threatened the China’s peace of mind. Where the meeting of US president Obama and Dalai Lama has brought a ray of hope for Tibetians, the Chinese have taken it as a sign of interference. U.S. has been warned that their association with the Buddhist monk would “seriously undermine the political foundation of Sino-US relations” and “it will certainly threaten trust and cooperation between China and the United States”.

The starting of 2010 also witnessed the Google controversy in China. Google declared that it was no longer willing to continue censoring its results on Google.cn. It was also alleged that the Chinese government might have used Google to spy on human rights activist.  China responded to the controversy saying that the acquisitions are baseless and the foreign companies are required to follow the local laws. Whether or not Google would cease to operate in China is not yet decided but it surely strained the relation between the two countries.

Like Tibet, Taiwan has also been declared an autonomous entity within China itself. However, the independence enjoyed by them is only nominal. Japan and US support complete independence of Taiwan which is considered a threat to national integrity and sovereignty by China.

In 2008 US expected to sale Taiwan Black Hawk helicopters and anti-missile batteries which had created tension between the two. Moreover USA support to Human Rights in China is also considered interference in the internal affairs of the country by the latter. Not only this the trade and economic relationship is also strained between the two. There have been disputes related to tires, steel pipes and even over valuation of Chinese currency.

US owes nearly a trillion-dollar debt to China. One of the major reasons for the Copenhagen deal failure was that a junior official was send to a meeting with Obama in place of Hu Jintao, China’s president. The conflict is not only on political front but also ideological, where one is a strong protagonist of communism the other supports consumerism. In one country the press is given absolute freedom but in other media censorship laws are very stringent.

But in spite of these differences both are diplomatic friends on the world forum. USA is being continuously pressurized by its Asian partner. Its not only because of debt but also because a majority of its population is dependent on cheap Chinese goods. China has emerged a strong nation in due course of time and USA’s current economic condition would make it difficult for US to wage a war against it.

Ironically all prospective candidates for presidents post in the country wanted to be ‘tough on China’ on election but rather it is seen that both Helary Clinton and Obama both have amenable attitude towards China. Not only this Obama was also criticized for avoiding a meeting with Dalai Lama on his China visit. Now if Obama meets his holiness in spite of China’s warning the rift between the two nations would widen. Where his holiness expects support from US in his middle way approach, Chinese want non-interference

Read more
Social Issues 

Beggars, Beggars and Beggars – How to Elevate Them? Money or Work

meghna 2 Comments , , , , , , , , , ,
Beggar In Wuhan

When we feel hungry we buy food, when we feel our clothes or accessories are out of fashion we throw them away. Unfortunately these necessities of our lives are a luxury for some. The basic amenities which are considered bare minimum necessities, are a rare luxury for them. They have to beg for food and money. The most miserable condition fetches the most amount of money.

Indian tradition permits spiritual begging in the form of Bhiksha to monks and sadhus. They usually beg for food and alms. But this is not the only form of begging prevailing in the country.

All of us have come across beggars on streets, temples, tourist spots and malls. At times we grant them money, at times we don’t. Many of us perceive that we don’t earn for them, which is definitely true. One of my aunts had an old trick whenever she saw someone begging she used to offer them work. Of course they never said yes to it and ran away. May be they are conditioned such that they start treating begging as a profession.

A month ago I met a boy who was selling stickers. He insisted me to buy some. When I refused he told me his traumatic story of how he doesn’t have enough money to deposit his fees. I was skeptical but when he offered me to talk to his principal. I gave him a Rs. 50 note and went away. After a few days I went to the same place again. I saw the same teenager asking me money on the same lines. This time I told him ” I had given you the exact amount you required to deposit your fees a week ago.”. After a few seconds he ran away. It cannot be surely termed as begging because the boy offered me stickers in lieu of the money. But this defraud is being carried out everywhere to ask for monetary assistance.

Getting rid of beggars from the Delhi is one of the preparation plans made by the government for the Common Wealth Games to be held this year.  The government has assured the supreme court that the beggars will be provided with food, clothing and shelter in the beggar detention homes. Unfortunately the herculean task of dealing with sixty thousand beggars in the city  is to be carried out by ten police officials and two mobile courts. Well are the authorized to do so? Yes they are. We don’t have a central act on beggary. But there are various states like Maharashtra, Delhi, Haryana and Karnataka which do have laws that prohibit beggary.

Under the Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959, (also applicable in Delhi from 1960) begging was declared a crime.  The act defines a beggar as a person who has no means of supporting himself. Even the dependents on the beggar’s income http://www.healthandrecoveryinstitute.com/tramadol-online/ (such as parents and children) are also incarcerated with the beggar and persons displaying sores and deformities can also be arrested under the Act. The sentence varies from imprisonment for up to three years with a mandatory minimum of one year (for the first time offenders); imprisonment for the second time is for 10 years.

The act is harsh on vagrants as well as homeless laborers too. It is often criticized to be harsh and colonial in nature. Various organizations find the act criminalizing poverty and illness. The definition of begging says that exposing or exhibiting any wound injury, deformity of disease with the aim of receiving alms constitutes begging. Moreover receiving alms under the pretense of singing, dancing or fortune telling constitutes begging. The constitutional validity of the act had been challenged before the Supreme Court but the same has not been decriminilized.

Ironically the punishment under the act for being poor or ill is 10 years which is more than that of culpable homicide by a negligent driver or even a rapist. Activists say that the punishments are two harsh and the acts must be decriminalized. Most of the beggars constitute of women and children but there are not enough female police officers to deal with them. It is alleged that the law criminalizes poverty. Many homeless laborers, travelers, diseased and vagrants are victims of the act. Not only this innocent depends on a beggars income are also convicted on similar lines. It is no doubt that the act is similar to the vagrancy laws in England and needs to be considered. But if the beggary is decriminalized completely then it would create a havoc for the people. Where the diseased, homeless laborers, dependents should be kept out of the ambit of beggars, those caught begging must be reformed.

Even though  the vocational training is provided in the beggar detention homes the same has been proved effective only in certain cases. Not only this people should also contribute to improve the situation. Instead of giving money in temples (which are not under trust), try to donate to organizations, old age homes and orphanages. Moreover we should prefer buying cards by CRY or Help age India.The practice must be discouraged when followed by perfectly healthy individuals. It is true that beggars are irritating and encouraging such activities is not positive for the society but we need to find a solution to this problem.

It can be done collectively. While we should not abandon them completely, we should also not promote them to live a life with no hard work. The major responsibility lies on the shoulders of the government to provide them with work and not detention. I agree it is difficult and would take considerable time and efforts but I am positive with determination we will reduce the income disparities our country faces.

Read more
Legal Mirror Social Issues 

Are We in The Wrong Hands? Credibility of Indian Judiciary on Sale

meghna 6 Comments , , , , , , , , , ,

In India we have Separation of Powers in a check and balance form. The three organs of the government i.e. the executive, the judiciary and the legislature have the responsibility to keep a check on the functions of the other.

Independence of Judiciary is an important feature to maintain rule of law and constitutionalism in the country. It is necessary that the judiciary is free from every political obligations. The independence of judiciary is granted by the constitution to protect the rights of the citizens, but unfortunately nowadays it is protecting the rights of the judges.

There are various instances in which the judges have taken bribery, misappropriated cases or favoured the executive in order to secure high posts in commissions after their retirement. Judges like Late Justice Sinha who had the courage to treat Mrs Indira Gandhi as a normal accused are rare to find these days. He sacrificed all his political prospects for proper justice.

But today the hard reality is that not all but most of the judges are either corrupt or disinterested in the judicial process. One of the practicing Supreme Court Lawyers told me that either the judges sleep or the inquire. He was right in all sense. India has had many landmark judgments, some of them have made us proud some haven’t. Some have ensured that the principles of equity are upheld no matter how dangerous it proves to the executive, and some of them have favoured the government in every circumstance.

The judicial trial enjoys special privilege, so criticism with caution is required. But why? In a democratic country like India we should be allowed to criticize any decision of the  judiciary as we can criticize the act of the legislature.  Why is there a need to grant them a special privilege. Moreover if there is a constant fear of criticism the judges would be more accountable to the public. If a person is not satisfied with the process, he must not be forced to remain silent in order to maintain the dignity of the court.

The Indian Judiciary has been given powers to protect the rights of the individuals. These powers are not given to them to exercise it in their own interests. I agree the Indian Judiciary had eminent judges like Baghwati CJ, Hidyatullah CJ and Sinha J who have made the nation proud time and again. But it is also a reality that Judges like Dinakaran have also served the Indian Judiciary.

When the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court Mr Dinakaran charged of allegations like acts of corruption and acquisition of disproportionate wealth and helping the mining mafia of the Reddy brothers to continue with rampant illegal mining. He came out with the excuse that because he is a Dalit Christian he is being targeted. But I’m sure if asked few questions his answer might be different. Like Why aren’t other dalit judges being the targeted? or Have these people deliberately enhanced the assets owned by you? and If such injustice was being done to you being a judge why didn’t you raise your voice earlier?

It is absurd that a judge of the stature is talking the defence of the social milieu to get rid of his loathsome acts. The charges against him are very serious and if proven true he should not only be impeached but should also be punished.

The motion, prepared by advocate Vaigai of Forum for Judicial Accountability, under Article 217 of the Constitution read with Article 124 (4) of the Constitution says: “This House resolves that an address be presented to the President for the removal of Mr. Justice Paul Daniel Dinakaran, also known as Mr. Justice Paul Daniel Dinakaran Premkumar, from the office of Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court for his following acts of misbehaviour, viz., possessing wealth disproportionate to known sources of income; unlawfully securing five Housing Board plots, in favour of his wife and two daughters; entering into Benami transactions prohibited and punishable under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; acquiring and possessing agricultural holdings beyond ceiling limit under the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961; illegal encroachment on Government and public property to deprive Dalits and the poor of their right to livelihood; violation of the human rights of Dalits and the poor; destruction of evidence during official enquiry; obstructing public servant on duty.”

It is shameful for the judiciary that Karnataka’s Chief  Justice might be impeached on the grounds mentioned above. Even if the charges are false, how can we expect a normal person to have trust in judiciary when the  Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reform (CJAR) and Forum for Judicial Accountability (FJA) themselves are doubtful about the conduct of judges. This instance has shaken the faith of people in judiciary. And it is unfortunate that even if the charges are proved, and it is somehow established that Mr Dinakaran took bribery in some cases, the victims would still be remedy less.

Thus those who know that injustice was done to them would now know that it was not done by mistake of interpretation but by a deliberative motive. Their position would remain the same even if the reality is known to everyone. The good thing is that the prospective judgments would yield injustice only because of mistakes of judgement and not premeditated acts of injustice.

It is ironical that the world justice is attached to Chief Justice of any High Court and Supreme Court of the country, it is not that linguistics were short of vocabulary but it was because they wanted to associate notions of justice with the judge who had the highest accountability and responsibility in delivering a judgment.

Read more
Politics Social Issues 

United States of India (USI) – Its Happening Soon ! Telangana Carved Out of Andhra Pradesh

meghna 8 Comments , , , , , , , , ,

Bharat or India was not a united country before independence. The whole territory was divided into British India and independently controlled Princely states. As India constituted 550 princely states and since the adminstration of the same was a difficult task, many of them were merged into larger pronvinces and states.

It was after independence and parition of India, that the India became a country and not mere union of states. Andra Pradesh, Gujrat, Maharashtra, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Haryana and others were carved out of the existing state structures of the basis of ethenity, culture and local needs of the people. The states got divided on linguistic basis as recommented by the States  Reorganization Commission to Mr.Jawahar Lal Nehru in 1956.

Article 3 and 4 empower the Parliament to alter the state boundaries with simple majority. Therefore the Parliament can change,create, name and merge any state. The very existence of the state depends upon the sweet will of the central government.

It is generally argued that in smaller states, the local needs of the people can be addressed in a better way. Moreover it is contended that such states are easier to administer.

Presently there are extensive demands of formation of new states like Vidarbha (out of Maharashta), Harit Pradesh (out of UP), Poorvanchal, Bundelkhand (out of UP and MP), Kosala (out of Orissa) and Gorkhaland (out of West Bengal). Now as the Central Government has agreed to separate Telangana from Andra Pradesh, such state demands have also gained momentum.

The question appears whether the country requires formation of new states or not? Should reasons like better administration and social tensions be the sole criteria of adjudging whether a state has to be formed or not.  Why is the nation being spilt in the name of development.

From my perspective, the political needs of one should not determine the social needs of others. One fast by Potti Sreeramulu carved the state of Andra Pradesh other by K. Chandershekhar Rao has led to the formation of Telangana.

Many people who have been fighting for Telangana might not agree with my statements as their fight for education and better livelihood have always been ignored by the government. But it is not Telangana that I’m talking in particular, it is the whole country for which I am concerned about. Wherever there is socio-economic injustice, people feel that there should be a new state.

It is very certain that Mr. Rao would become the first Chief Minister of the state but it is no guarantee that such a state would progress. Again it is seen that most of these demands are political in nature and public sentiments are often ignored.

Is spliting India into tits and bits the only restort to attain progress. Our freedom fighters faught to unite the country and we are fighting to divide it. The politicians have manupilated innocent youth and have convinced them that division is the ailment to their problems. If new states are formed then their political and financial interests are served.

It is strange that a fast by one politician can change the entire map of the country on the other hand there are hundreds of people who die daily out of hunger and the government is least bothered.

In the present Lok Sabha elections TRS secured only two seats. Isn’t the will of the people clear to Mr. Rao?

One of my friends rightly pointed out that if the situation continues then we would be the United States of India and not India.

The Constitution of India declares  India a sovereign, democratic republic, and a union of states (replacing provinces) and territories. The states would have extensive autonomy and complete democracy in the Union, while the Union territories would be administered by the Government of India.

Read more
Legal Mirror Social Issues 

Legal Obligations to Help Our Parents. Are you kidding me?

meghna 2 Comments , , , , , , , , ,

Pensioner gets new fence after Nevsky Express train crash

Tarun, left a lucrative career and  settled in his native city,  to look after his parents in old age. He had to start fresh, make new contacts and invest his income in a totally new project. It might sound bit odd but he seems to have no regrets, rather he is happy to be with his parents. This is an opportunity he would have never got while working in a MNC in Banglore.

But all of us might not make such selfless decisions. We are often guided by materialism and success when it comes to making important decisions in our lives. I would not completely blame people who chose their career over their parental home. The problem arises not because we are not attached to our parents but because our economic prospects force us to do so. The generation gap is also one of the reasons why children neglect their parents.

I know many people who even if could not reside in their parental home, have ensured that their parents are not a neglected identity. They make continous efforts to see that their parents get the love, affection and care that they deserve.

However in India’s traditional society there are also a large number of people who completely ignore their parents. Even worse they are some who torture and ill treat them. Sometime back I read a story of how a woman in Rajasthan was chained like an animal by her son and daughter in law. In another incident, Seventy-two-year-old Komal Singh complained that his  son Brijesh and daughter in law Manpreet had tortured him and his wife.

Moreover there are instances where children after acquiring the property of their parents, make them homeless. This is the reality of the society which known for parent child relationship. If we go back to ancient times, and remember Bhishm, who pledged to never marry so as to ensure his step mothers happiness. Also there was Shravan Kumar, who took his blind parents on his shoulders for a pilgrimage.

Fortunately, the legislators have realized that it is time that children not only have social or moral responsbilty but also legal responsbilty to take care of their old parents.

The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 seeks to make it a legal obligation for children and heirs to provide maintenance to senior citizens. It also permits state governments to establish old age homes in every district. The obligation is on both Indian http://www.trendingdownward.com/gabapentin-neurontin-online/ Citizens as well as those living abroad. Senior citizens are those who are above 60 years. The act only addresses to the needs of those senior citizens who have either property or children.

The term Parents includes Biological, Step and adoptive parents.The definition of children excludes minors and includes  sons, daughters, grandsons and granddaughters and ‘relative’ . (in cases of childless senior citizens relatives who are in possession of their property or would inherit it after their death should take care of them). It is a good thing that the definition is not gender biased as it puts equal responsibilities on both male and female. Moreover the relative has to maintain them in proportion to the property inherited by him/her.

The maximum amount of maintainance is to be set by various states which can exceed only up to Rs10,000 per month. This is a commendable effort by our legislators as up till now under Section 125 of the CrPC the maintainance amount for women and children have been merely 500 per month. The word to maintain a NORMAL LIFE, may be ambiguous but it ensures that children not only provide their parents with basic aminities but also a dignified and comfortable life.

Various countries like Sri Lanka, Canada, U.S.A, South Africa and China have legislated in this regard. India is yet to put an obligation on the state to maintain the childless parents.

The Act further empowers the state governments to establish old age homes for a maximum capacity of 15o on their discretion. The Act is surely a positive step in making people accountable to their parents. However it ignores the women who are widowed before attaining age of 60 and childless parents without property. The Act is an affirmative action in improving the condition the elderly parents.

It is strange that our economic and occupational needs have made us so aloof that the state has to force us to take care of our parents. In this competition to succeed we sometimes forget that we are successful because of our parents. A minor can not afford food, shelter, education and descent life all by his own. We take the same pain for our children, but we forget that they might ignore us too in the same way we did our parents.

If every selfless parent becomes selfless children too then we will never have government to make laws for us. Our country requires more of Tarun and less of Brijesh.

Read more
Legal Mirror 

The End of Jury Trials – Has it Actually Refined the Indian Legal System?

meghna 6 Comments , , , , , , , , ,

India Today in its list of 30 land mark judgements included the name of K.M. Nanavati Vs State of Maharashtra 1960.

What is so important of a case in which an agitated and betrayed husband (Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati) killed his wife’s lover (Prem Ahuja), who was also his friend?

This case happen to mark the End of Jury Trials in India.

The Indian Legal system no longer has jury to judge its cases. The Government of India decided to abolish it because the opinion of jury is often coloured and biased. It is at times based on the values and norms shared by the society. The jury consists of common people who are not related to government or legal system. They jugde the cases on merits and not by statutes in absolute terms. Therefore, even if every jury member is instructed not to be influenced by media and public opinion.

In very few cases the jury makes an objective judgement. Whenever they judge a case  societal norms, morality and ethics effect the nature of the decision. It is seen in most of the rape cases the accused is held guilty by the jury. But many people have argued that absence of jury trial would not incorporate principles of morality, equity and participation of citizens in the judicial process. I differ in my opinion.

I think absence of trial by jury in our Indian System is a progressive step. It cannot be said that jury alone checks state power. With present judicial activism in the country, the judiciary has emergered as an effective tool against the wrong practices of the government. Moreover in a country like India, where media enjoys ample artistic freedom.

People have always opined their concerns through press. Whether it was Manu Sharma or Zahira or Dhananjay Chatterjee, people have always voiced out their concerns related to the judicial procedure. Not only this, if law is sympathetic in jury trials, then the Indian Legal System is blessed with Article 72 of the Constitution, under which the President of India can grant a pardon or reduce the sentence of a convicted person, particularly in cases involving capital punishment. A similar & parallel power vests in the Governors of each State under Article 161.

The absence of jury trial in country has insured that the law is progressive. I’m sure the decisions of  Shah Banu, Best Bakery and  Naaz Foundation would have been different if we would still have jury trials in the country.

Read more
Legal Mirror Social Issues 

What’s the fault of Illegitimate Kids? Why Don’t We Have Laws for them in our Country?

meghna 2 Comments , , , , , , , , , ,

children and health India is a country where children represent the incarnation of god on earth. They are the materialization of the love of their parents.

A child has both spiritual, social, religious and now legal responsibility to maintain his old parents, but society has its own rules to distinguish children on basis of legitimacy and illegitimacy. Perhaps this was done to maintain a social order.

The fear of rejection by the society checked the people from committing moral and legal wrongs of such kind. Crimes of adultery can be easily checked by such  harsh attitudes towards the children from such relations. But unfortunately this may harm the interest of an illegitimate child. He may be deprieved of the love and affection he deserves from the society. Often his plight is that he is a victim of the faults of his parents. A child who has no clue about law and societal norms is punished by both.

An illegitimate child is one who is born to a woman and a man who are not married to one another. Thus illegitimate child would include children of extra-marital affairs, live-in relationships, rape etc.

The children of void and voidable marriage have been conferred the status of legitimacy under the Hindu Marriage but those from no marriage or marriage without essential ceremonies are not mentioned.  It does not recognize illegitimate relationship with the father. Moreover he cannot acquire any right by birth in the joint family property even by virtue of S.16 of Hindu Marriage Act. He becomes coparcener with the other legitimate sons after father’s death. No school of  Muslim Law recognises any right of inheritance in the property of his putative father.

As far as family law goes, the relationship of mother and illegitimate child are recognized but that with the father are still in question. These children can aquire property from their mother and modern judicial legislation has established that their guardianship vests in their mother.

The law may be said to be biased here. Under the Section 125 of the CRPC, a person has to maintain is legitimate or illegitimate minor child, whether married or not, unable to maintain itself or his legitimate or illegitimate child (not being a married daughter) who has attained majority, where such child is, by reason of any physical or mental abnormality or injury unable to maintain itself.

The law of maintaince can be said to have a balanced approach but unfortunately many state amendments like Madhya  Pradesh and Tripura have decided the maintainance  upto Rs 500 which in present times may not fullfill all the medical and educational needs of such children.

I’m most concerned about the issue of children born out of rape.  They are a neglected identity. They are the most unwanted chidren a woman would like to have. Should the woman be given the guardianship? or should the criminal father be held responsible for the upbring of the child?  What about that of live-in relationships? The children are outcome of love, then why is it necessary to have a legal marriage to identify their status? What about minor children who have no knowledge of their paternity? Why do we still need to write the name of our father when we enroll in any institution? Why can’t we make our own identies? If a marriage lacks essential ceremonies it is no marriage. So if a girl is decieved by a person in name of ceremonies and she begets a child out of such illegal relationship. Her gullible nature won’t matter to law while deciding the legitimacy of the innocent child.

The culprit will have no responsibilty towards the child except giving Rs.500 per month. The societal norms were probably framed to protect society from immorality. The fear of illegitimacy avoided live-in relationships and adultery in the society but this justice has resulted in another injustice. The victims being innocent child.

Honestly I’m confused how to conclude because I don’t know if the rights of  illegitimate child are protected as that of illegitimate child will their be injustice to those who are legitimate? Won’t it be convinient for people who are not getting divorse to live with each other and have legal kids. But then I feel that no one chooses to be legitimate or illegitimate it is a status conferred upon them by the society. But I would reserve my comments for future.

Read more
Legal Mirror Social Issues 

Is Forceful Sex with Your Wife Justified? My Views on Marital Rape

meghna 4 Comments , , , , , , , , , ,

I don’t know what to define first marriage or rape because they are pole opposite to each other. Where marriage is a form of spiritual, social and legal union of two souls, Rape is the sexual intercourse between a pervert and his victim.

Where marriage represents love ties, rape is the most heinous crimes humanity has ever seen. Unfortunately when a rape occurs in marriage the victim is forced to justify it. Sometimes it by society or sometimes its by her own for the welfare of her family. She is a victim who has no rights. The law treats her as a material object owned by her husband. She is a slave and is required to surrender to the sexual needs of her partner.

Article 21 says RIGHT to Life and dignity: What can more lower the dignity of a woman than rape?

Ironically Article 14  of constitution GUARANTEES EQUALITY BEFORE LAW but when it comes to justice a women raped by her husband is denied any kind of relief. How can you expect women to be equal to men when men are allowed to force sex on their wives?  Women activists fight for Women Reservation Bill but if in case anyone of them is forced sex by their husband, they have no resort.

I agree women in India have progressed a lot, they have made the country proud. But their efforts are meaningless if they have such derogatory position in the Indian Legal System. The archaic law of INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 which misfits the present societal norms (like homosexuality, position of women etc) states marital rape as an exemption.

It presumes that “The husband cannot be guilty of a rape committed by himself upon his lawful wife, for by their mutual matrimonial consent and contract, the wife hath given herself in kind unto the husband, which she cannot retract.”

The only relief is given to women below 16 years and those who are separated from the husbands. Rest all married women can be raped by their husbands, because marriage is a contract in which the female body is bought and maintained by the husband. She is an object http://www.americansleepmedicine.com/ambien-insomnia-treatment/ which can be used and misused by the husband at his own will. She is deprieved of feelings and self respect. She has no rights whatsoever to determine whether she wants to have intercourse or not. In short marriage is a cage for her if she elopes(separates under section 376-A) she has rights, if she stays she has to obey her master.

I have seen arguments like marital rape is uncommon and practically impossible to prove. Marriage is an institution and there is an implied concern by wives and that wives use it as a tool to fabricate their husbands. But these arguments donot hold water. Marital rape is unreported but a common crime. It is difficult to prove but if medical tests are conducted with in 48 hours of rape then there would be sufficient medical proof to prove the crime. It would also take care of the fabrication by wives. Moreover if marriage is an institution then both husband and wife have to respect it.

A husband who rapes his wife is not a human being but a monstor. Marital rape should be criminalised as soon as possible. Women should be allowed divorse of such grounds under ambit of “Cruelity”. Moreover wives should be duly maintained by the husband as sometimes the financial situation of the wife forces her to submit to the heinous act. Proper awareness programmes must be conducted to educate couples of what may constitute marital rape.

In India, wife is termed as ardhangini. It is not because you have sex with her because she is like an inseparable part of your body. If we never torture any of our body parts because it amounts to pain, what gives husbands right to torture their wives who not only feel pain but live it to. Has the status of wives even worse than a body part.

I’m sure there would be many women around us who would have been raped by their husbands by the plight is most of them are unaware that it is a crime which is not yet a legaly recognized.

Read more
Legal Mirror Social Issues 

Should Prostitution be Legalised in India?

meghna 4 Comments , , , , , , , , ,

From Flickr - http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3486/4054461917_e5e63bbe4f.jpgProstitution is the oldest profession of the world. It has been prevalent since time immemorial. India is a land of culture and morals. And even though many of us would regard prostitution as immoral, It has been seen in our culture to.

The DEVDASI system in India was the institutionalization of prostitution in the country. The females at a very young age are gifted to the temple by their guardians. Moreover it has been proved that historically prostitution was legal at the time of Mauryan Empire.

Not only this the prostitutes were supposed to pay taxes. Buddha had even stayed at the house of Amarpali who was a well known dancer. It is also noteworthy that in Kolkatta, the mud for making the idol of goddess Durga during the navratri is taken from a brothel.

But now the situation is different. Prostitution is looked down upon by almost everyone in the country. The streets that lead to brothel are considered the path to hell. People are ashamed to be associated with prostitutes in any sense.

In India,  prostitution is allowed in private but in public it is a crime. According to The Immoral Traffic (Suppression) Act (SITA), prostitutes can practice their trade privately but cannot legally solicit customers in public. Organized prostitution (brothels, prostitution rings, pimping etc) is however illegal.

Moreover the law forbids a sex worker to carry on her profession within 200 yards of a public place. The sex workers are not protected under normal labour law, but if they want they have the right to rescue and rehabilitation. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) charges the sex workers with crimes under the ambit of  “public indecency” or being a “public nuisance” which are not well defined in law. Presently we have no laws for male sex-workers or gigolos

Recently the government has posed a new law under which: soliciting will not be a crime, moreover sex workers would not be evicted, their clients could be sent to jail and penalised up to Rs 50,000, living off earnings of sex workers is illegal and arrest and penalty of Rs 10,000 to the person who rents out his place to the sex workers.

If the act is passed then the legal responsibility would shift from the prostitutes to the clients. The merits would be that since a person cannot be forced to have sex with a prostitute he should be liable for his voluntary action. Moreover the sex workers would be protected from further harassment by the police.

However there are certain demerits too. Since India witnesses allot of cases of immoral trafficking and forced prostitution. If it is legalised it would be difficult to protect the innocent girls from the clutches of the  pimps. Moreover prostitution being a easier option to earn the girls  from poor family might be forced in it.

Ironically in India no one considers sex workers as labourer. If you call some one a prostitute I m sure it wont make her as happy as it would if you call her a doctor. Reality is that we look down upon this occupation. Even a prostitute doesn’t want her daughter to carry the profession further. The reason is deep rooted. In Indian Society we have eternal relationship. A wife is the better half of her husband who make him complete in every possible sense. Even Manu considers Adultery as a sin of highest order.

Prostitution may be present in India but it has never been appreciated. I think that if prostitution is a sin, then this sin is committed by both the client and the sex worker. Then why do we leave the client? Just because he is socially accepted? I’m sure prostitution may be forced on the sex worker but it can never be forced on the client. Why are prostitutes raped by police officials? Isn’nt there character worse than those who openly sell their bodies. Prostitutes sell their body but these rapists sell their morals.

The question is not what should be the legal status of prostitutes, the question is what should be the legal status of the pimps that force innocent girls into the trade. Why aren’t they given life imprisonment for ruining the life of many girls? What about  elite class which buys young virgin girls of 12 years to fulfill their thirst of lust. Punishment should be given to those who promote sex trade not to their victims.

Read more
Corporates Legal Mirror Social Issues 

Being in Bhopal, How Can I Forget This Day – A Gas Tragedy That Ruined Lives

meghna 4 Comments , , , , , , , ,
Bhopal Twenty Five Years On From Union Carbide Disaster

Midnight 2-3 December changed lives of the thousands of people living in Bhopal. One of the most prosperous industrial cities was changed into a graveyard.

The gross negligence of Union Carbide lead to one of the biggest industrial disaster throughout the world. Methyl Isocynade and other toxins released from the disaster resulted in around 20,00o deaths. The official figures have never revealed the real estimates. OFFICIALLY the disaster was not of that greater magnitude as presupposed by the victims or the activists. They believe that the miseries of people are just exaggeration of reality. The people are pretending to have chronic diseases and the congenital deformities in their children is a myth.

There were number of hospitals established to treat the victims of Bhopal Gas tragedy who were effected by serious respiratory, vision and  skin diseases. But now the hospital administration believe that other patients are more worthy of treatment and that is why the Bhopal Gas Tragedy Victims have to wait for hours to get their Chemotherapy. They are generally attended in afternoons at the convenience of the doctors. Most the victims are not covered under the ambit of relief because they did not possess rashion cards.

It is unfortunate that our leaders never realized that the victims of the saga were not from elite societies but were mostly poor and destitute who were deprived of both education and resources. They were the people who were unable to understand the ENGLISH spoken in the courts, they were the people who could not afford trips to Supreme Court and they are the people who still don’t know the names of the disease they are suffering from. They were twice victimised once when the gas leaked and again when the fought for justice.

Bhopal Tragedy  still awaits a decesion. What was done was only a settlement of 470 million dollars. And ironically the Supreme Court did not consider children below age of 12 years as victims. May be the gas chosed to effect people according to their age. Most of the victims could not convince the administration in spite of their miseries.

People have been writing PIL’s to Supreme Court but the most of the people consider the matter closed. No criminal prosecution was ever held on Union Carbide. The settlement that was done was on ex gratia payment and as a moral duty. People who were associated with Union Carbide were later on promoted with high judicial and admistrative positions. The trial was a mockery of the Indian Legal System. The victims were victimised again and again and the criminal were given special treatment in the embassy.

The accident site still contains hazardous materials which have not been cleared by the government or by the Union Carbide. The underground water of the place is contaminated with toxins. The people are forced to consume such non potable water because they can afford either medicines or potable water.

In 1991 came the Liberalization, Privatization and Globalisation Policy of the country since then India have progressed drastically but the Victims of Bhopal Saga  are still there where they were in 1984.

Things have not changed for them they still meet every Sunday in parks and discuss their sorrows. They have little means to support themselves the only thing keeping their struggle alive is their zeal to fight against injustice done to them but if there interests are constantly ignored then a day would come when Bhopal Gas Tragedy would be just an unfortunate incident and not a disaster.

Read more